UK Athletics performance director Neil Black will make a decision on his future “sooner rather than later” after claiming he was blindsided by the doping revelations surrounding Alberto Salazar.
The American, who coached Mo Farah to all four of his Olympic titles, was handed a four-year ban last week when the US Anti-Doping Agency found him guilty of “orchestrating and facilitating prohibited doping conduct” while overseeing his distance running programme at the Nike Oregon Project.
Black previously hailed Salazar as a “one of the best people to work with that I have ever come across” and a “genius” despite a swirl of previous accusations. And he signed off on continuing to fund Farah to train in Oregon following an investigation overseen by current UKA president Jason Gardener.
It has all left Black, once a runner for Bellahouston Harriers, with egg splattered all over his face for supporting Salazar, who was previously employed as a consultant by the British governing body. “I was shocked when (the report) came out,” he insisted before departing the world championships in Doha.
But it is understood that recently-appointed UKA chair Chris Clark has already begun to personally revisit past documents and processes. And any lapses identified might yet remove the choice from the performance supremo over whether he remains in post.
“Travelling home,” Black said, “I'll be reviewing all the information. The board are obviously reviewing all the information and the first person I'll speak to will be the chair Chris Clark. We will go through it in detail and that's the point I personally will begin to think about my understanding of it, the implications and how I feel about it.”
No athletes were implicated directly in the USADA dossier although it alleged that that painkillers, asthma and thyroid medications were given to athletes at the Oregon Project for a competitive advantage. Black firmly denied that has ever occurred on his watch. Farah, he insisted, remained under UKA’s medical supervision, even while he was based in the USA. He plans to fly Stateside for next weekend’s Chicago Marathon to assist the British star in his bid. “Nothing at all has changed in terms of my belief regarding Mo Farah,” he said.
With an Olympic season now lurking over the horizon, he insisted he that he still wants to be “the person leading the team through to Tokyo 2020.” Performances at the world championships weakened his hand with just five medals brought home: two golds, for Dina Asher-Smith and Katarina Johnson-Thompson, plus three silvers.
Callum Hawkins, fourth in the marathon, was one of the few males who made a mark. But Black believes that the fifth place earned by Laura Muir in the 1500m following a speedy return from injury points towards an Olympic medal come Tokyo next August. The Scot produced the second-quickest time of her career and it was “one of the performances of the competition,” he declared.
“My thought and concern was whether it was possible to do three races in four days and still bring your best,” Black admitted. “I think she demonstrated that incredibly - she probably exceeded what we might have thought. Historically 3:55 wins medals, I think she's really impressed with herself.
“She's probably learned something that says ‘bloody hell, if I can off different or altered preparation, I’ve got even more.’ I think she will demonstrate more and so you know in a roundabout way, the learning and the potential for the future is even greater. But the event is obviously massive at this stage.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here