ROSS COUNTY goalkeeper Ross Laidlaw had to do a quick head count to make sure that Celtic weren’t playing with extra men as they tore his team apart on Saturday.
The former Hibernian keeper was his side’s top player as he kept the scoreline down to six. If not for his efforts, Celtic easily could have hit double figures.
But far from being dispirited, Laidlaw is putting the experience down to simply catching the champions on a day when they were at the top of their game.
“It was just the speed of them, they had players coming everywhere,” Laidlaw said.
“Their wee right back was brilliant, and they just absolutely killed us in behind in the second half.
“With the chances they created, they had so many different players who were brilliant.
“It felt like they had more players on the park than us. Being in the goal, I could have sworn they had two or three more players on the park.
“They were really good. I spoke to their manager after the game, who said they were really good, and we just caught them on the wrong day.
“I had a few saves to make. I had to, because I don’t think we were at the races.
“We are bitterly disappointed to come here and get beaten 6-0. We caught Celtic on a really good day, they were brilliant.
“It’s still disappointing, because at the end of the day I still let in six goals. That’s not a great feeling after the game.
“I just had to try and do what I had to do and keep the ball out of the net.”
Remarkably, a combination of Laidlaw’s brilliance and Celtic’s wasteful finishing meant that County were just a goal down at the interval, but any hopes of mounting a comeback were soon extinguished.
“We were quite positive at half time,” Laidlaw said. “Celtic had a lot of chances in the first half, but we were still in the game.
“It was 4-0 after 50 minutes, and it was just damage limitation at that stage. It was hard to keep ourselves going, but we had to try and do that.
“We just lost a poor goal at the start of the second half. We made a mistake for that, and I think the heads just dropped.
“With the way Celtic were playing, they were brilliant, and we just couldn’t live with them.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here