There’s a book that comes highly recommended called ‘Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump’, in which the current US President’s dodgy duplicity on the fairways, greens and in the rough is documented in all its unedifying glory.
If it’s not the use of a foot wedge here then it’s the brazen absurdity of a gimme chip there. Perhaps the author could hastily cobble together an addendum with a chapter on Patrick Reed?
The former Masters champion, who is in Australia this week as part of Team USA in the Presidents Cup match with the Internationals, caused a right old rumpus at the weekend as his highly dubious antics – or act of cheating as many have called it – in the Hero World Challenge thrust him back into a spotlight of controversy.
Then again, his actions may get him the Presidential Medal of Freedom from madcap Trump.
Amid the mounting criticism of Reed’s rules violation – footage showed him twice brushing away sand behind his ball with two practise swings – Australian tour pro Cameron Smith, who is in Ernie Els’ International side for this week’s tussle, didn’t hold back.
He suggested that Reed’s limp explanation of the incident was “bulls**t” while adding that he “didn’t have any sympathy for anyone that cheats”.
If Smith and Reed go head-to-head at any point at Royal Melbourne, the matchplay bout will have to take place inside a canvas ring given all this verbal sparring.
READ MORE: Reed's intentions were far from honourable
Reed, who remains typically defiant, clearly doesn’t give a Castlemaine Four X what anybody thinks about him but the 29-year-old insists he is not a cheat.
In the merry midst of the panto season, the cry “oh yes he is” is not just reserved for the Pavilion Theatre.
“It’s not the right word to use,” Reed said of the ‘c’ word as he attempted another defence of his activities. “At the end of the day, if you do something unintentionally that breaks the rules, it’s not considered cheating and at the end of the day that’s what it is.
“If you’re intentionally trying to do something, that would be considered cheating, but I wasn’t intentionally trying to improve a lie or anything like that, because if it was, it would have been a really good lie and I would have hit it really close.”
Not many people are buying Reed’s lame excuses – well, apart from President Trump perhaps - and the reaction of the galleries to the American when the competition heats up could be interesting.
Reed has always been something of a rabble-rousing character in the team arena and, having been on the receiving end of some withering observations from other players, he is clearly relishing being the villain of the piece.
READ MORE: McIlroy takes moral stance on Saudi Arabia event
“It goes from wanting to beat those guys to it now turning personal, so it’s going to be a fun week,” he added.
“They (the International team members) are going to speak out, because they want to get their crowds going and get on their side. That’s the name of the game.
“At the end of the day, all I can do is control what I can do and how I play, and so it doesn’t matter who I’m playing on the other team.
“My job this week as the captain has told all of our guys is to go out and win your point.”
Reed was given the tag Captain America for his Ryder Cup heroics. At the moment, though, he’s more like that Commander in Cheat.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here