STEVEN NAISMITH insists it would be unfair to relegate Hearts to the Championship without another ball being kicked this term.
The Jambos are four points adrift at the foot of the Premiership and face a fight for survival on and off the park after the Coronavirus crisis that has left Scottish football reeling.
Naismith has become the first player to confirm he will accept Ann Budge's request to take a 50 per cent pay cut and boss Daniel Stendel will work for free in the coming months.
But the future remains uncertain at Tynecastle and Hearts face the very real possibility of being relegated if the SPFL board decide to declare the campaign over with current positions standing as final.
Naismith said: "It would be sad and I don’t think it’s fair to do that. You’d be going into the tightest part of the season where you play all the teams around you and the games become six pointers for us.
"I don’t think there’s an easy answer for us. It goes back to the side issues with everyone to try to get the best decision. But it’s not an easy one to make.
"If we went down to the Championship I’d still be at the club. I wouldn’t be leaving. I’d be staying.
"I can see how good a club it is and how much potential there is. It’s been so frustrating the way we’ve been that we find ourselves in this situation.
"The potential is so high in general that I want to be part of this club at its good points and when it’s fighting for trophies and Europe and things like that.
"Results don’t lie but I don’t think it’ll take too much for the club to get back to where it should be in terms of challenging in the top half of the table. But it doesn’t take away the fact it’s not been good enough."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here