HEARTS tonight revealed they are incensed after being ordered by the SFA and SPFL Joint Response Group (JRG) to stop training.
The JRG announced this afternoon that "a wide range of measures agreed with the Scottish government to reinforce Scottish football’s commitment to public health and adherence to protocols" were being introduced.
The move comes after eight Aberdeen players - two of whom have tested positive for coronavirus - and a Celtic player were found to have breached strict Covid-19 guidelines since Premiership clubs resumed training.
First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said she would shut down the professional game in this country again if there were any further incidents and the JRG has accepted a request from the Scottish government to postpone Aberdeen and Celtic's games this week.
Hearts are the only club outwith the top flight to resume training and a statement posted on their official website revealed they have incurred "significant unecessary costs" as a result of the development.
The Tynecastle club, whose legal challenge against their relegation from the Premiership failed after going through the SFA arbitration process, are considering their next step.
The Hearts statement read: "Heart of Midlothian Football Club can confirm that we were advised at 4.30pm this afternoon of the decision of the Joint Response Group to delay the return to training for clubs outwith the SPFL Premiership and that as a consequence, Hearts were required to cease training with immediate effect.
"We requested a delay to the publication of that decision, while we discussed the implications. While the situation was being discussed internally, the decision was published, some 20 minutes or so later.
"While recognising the hugely complex decision-making processes involved in dealing with the Covid-19 crisis, the club has nonetheless objected to this decision in the strongest terms.
"To be clear, we had previously requested to return to training on August 3 to fit in with our training plans and needs. Along with a Betfred Cup campaign and Championship season to prepare for, we also have a Scottish Cup semi-final to participate in.
"We confirmed that we were able to comply with all the required protocols, which we have done. All other Championship clubs were given the same opportunity to return to training. They chose not to return at that time, as was their right.
"Having received authority to return to training, we built our plans around the agreed date. Our players and support staff were taken off furlough; contracts were signed with new staff and new players on the clear understanding that we would be in full training.
"We signed contracts with service providers, including Oriam and our testing company. Testing has once again been carried out this week, with costs incurred, in anticipation of continued training. Suffice to say that at a time when every football club in the land is managing its costs as tightly as possible, we have incurred significant 'unnecessary' costs.
"We have done nothing wrong and yet, once again, we are being disproportionately disadvantaged by a decision which has been described as 'the fairest'.
"We should not forget that this situation has come about, not because of Covid-19, but because of behavioural issues, not by our employees but by those of other clubs. This delay reflects a lack of confidence that certain clubs will be able to comply and meet the required protocols. How can it possibly be 'fair' that we should be penalised?
"When questioned in what way this was 'the fairest way forward', we were advised that some other clubs now wanted to return to training and it was deemed that by preventing them from doing so, without halting our training, would give us an unfair advantage.
"Our fans are naturally incensed by this action, especially given what has transpired over recent months. For the avoidance of doubt, everyone at the club is equally incensed. We are currently considering our options."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel