CRAIG BROWN felt privileged to watch two outstanding young talents in Ryan Christie and James Maddison as they spent a crucial part of their early careers developing at Pittodrie in his capacity as Aberdeen ambassador.
The pair have since blossomed into full internationals with their respective countries, but it is Maddison who tempted Leicester City to part with the best part of £20m to prise him away from Norwich City, while Christie quietly makes a name for himself back at Celtic.
While Brown is a fan of both players though, he believes that it is the man who the Scottish champions paid the relative chump change of £500,000 for back in 2015 that is the better player of the two.
“This is my own personal opinion, not that of the club nor Derek McInnes, but we had Ryan Christie on loan from Celtic and we had James Maddison on loan from Norwich City,” Brown said.
“I watched every game that Maddison played and every game that Christie played for Aberdeen, and my opinion was that Christie was the better player.
“And yet, Maddison went to Leicester City for £20m and is now in the England squad.
“He scored a great goal against Rangers which obviously made him a hero in Aberdeen, but when I looked at those two guys, Christie was better for me.
“They have both developed since then obviously, but if you ask me which of those players I would rather have in my team, then I would rather have Christie than Maddison.
“So, Scotland are lucky that we’ve got Christie.”
Christie’s emotional interview after scoring the goal that earned Scotland their draw in Serbia which eventually led to qualification for Euro 2020 after penalty kicks perfectly illustrates for Brown the passion with which he plays the game.
“His interview was great and it shows you what it means to him and to everybody,” he said.
“His father (Charlie) is a terrific guy and the family are real football people, and he’s a credit to them.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel