JAMES Tavernier last night held his hands up and confessed he was to blame for the first of two “sloppy” goals that Rangers conceded in another late collapse against Benfica.
Steven Gerrard’s side forged into a two goal lead in the Europa League match at Ibrox thanks to a first-half Scott Arfield strike and a Kemar Roofe screamer in the second.
But captain and right back Tavernier turned the ball into his own net in the 78th minute after failing to deal with an innocuous cross and then substitute Pizzi levelled.
The defender admitted he felt sorry that Roofe’s special strike didn’t win the match – but insisted that Rangers will be better placed to cope with top class opposition in future.
“I am disappointed,” he said. “We put ourselves in a good position. We go 2-0 up against a very good side. We can be a lot better on the two goals that we concede.
“It was just two sloppy goals basically. I can do better on the header at the back post. It goes into the box and then there are a few ricochets. For the second goal we have to be a bit tighter to the men with the combinations that we are doing.
“But they are a great side. It is good for us to learn from this going forward. It is a good learning curve. We can look back on this game and be stronger as a team. We can still take the positives out of the game. We put ourselves in a great position. We will move on.”
Asked about Roofe’s effort, Tavernier added: “He definitely turns up in Europe. He has done it in the league as well. He scores amazing goals. Tonight was a great one.
“It’s a shame. The headlines should be about Kemar and a great strike. That is disappointing. But we have just got to learn and move forward.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here