AS a Celtic supporter and long-time season ticket holder, I completely agree with Martin Hannan’s view that the club’s ill-advised trip to Dubai for their winter camp in the middle of a worsening global pandemic demonstrates the alarming extent of mismanagement and lack of coherent leadership that exists at present (Dubai trip is a reputational disaster for Celtic, January 12).
Though the trip may have been technically permitted by the Scottish Government and the governing football authorities, it hardly fell under the category of “essential travel” as mainland Scotland remained in Level 4.
READ MORE: Martin Hannan: The reputation of Celtic has been tarnished by Dubai Covid scandal
A club that had a considerable fixture backlog to fulfil, and that came under fire at the start of the pandemic for their insensitive treatment of non-playing staff, once again demonstrated a complete lack of respect for their supporters and the wider Scottish public.
Their PR own goal was made all the more morally repugnant by travelling again to a country with a questionable record on human rights and returning with a player testing positive for Covid-19 who should not have been on the trip due to a long-term injury.
The hierarchy at Celtic FC consistently appear to be out of touch with the values and ethos of their core support, and their decision-making here is contemptuous of the sacrifices people in this country have made throughout the duration of the pandemic.
READ MORE: Peter Lawwell issues apology to Celtic fans for Dubai trip
Regardless of their current footballing travails, the decision to go ahead with this trip demonstrates a breathtaking arrogance and lack of empathy. It was clearly morally wrong and the club should apologise for its grave mistakes. The board’s refusal to accept responsibility beggars belief and allows us an insight into the paranoid and defensive mindset therein.
It is not, as Mr Hannan suggests, the role of the Scottish Government to micromanage institutions like Celtic FC. The club’s reputation is in tatters and they alone are culpable.
Owen Kelly
Stirling
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel