MAURICE ROSS has apologised for making a "clumsy” racially insensitive comment aimed at Notts County player Enzio Boldewijn.
Ross, 40, resigned from his role as assistant manager at the club following a remark he made during the second half of County’s match with Altrincham on Saturday.
He confirmed on BBC Sportsound that he said of Boldewijn: “He looks like he is moving like a 40-year-old, what age is he actually? Does he have [a] doctored African passport”.
Explaining his comments, Ross said: “At the time it was clearly a reference to his ability because he is normally a quick player. I had no other intentions, other than I was questioning the mobility of a footballer. When I hear it back now, I’m wincing at it.
“There’s no rhyme or reason for it, it was a clumsy analogy, it was an insensitive analogy,” he added when asked why he felt it appropriate to make the remark.
“If I could take it back I would. This is a fellow professional. I have insulted his physical attributes and used a poor analogy to do so. I just feel sad that I’ve made a guy who is actually a really lovely boy, a nicer boy you couldn’t meet, feel bad about himself. That’s where my pain lies at the moment.”
Ross also confirmed that he resigned from his role as opposed to being sacked by the club. He continued: “The buck needs to stop with me in this and I’ve walked away from a four-and-a-half-year contract because of my guilt, my ill-feeling that I have had it in me to make another professional feel bad and it’s something that I need to carry about with me now.
“This is why I’m here, not to be exonerated. I’m here to apologise to an individual, Enzio, who is a cracking footballer, a cracking lad and I can only say sorry.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel