JOHN HARTSON knows better than most about what it takes to be a hit striker at Parkhead.
But the Welshman, who scored 109 goals for Celtic, has warned fans any deal for Hibs striker Kevin Nisbet would come with an element of risk and wouldn't be straight-forward to complete.
Nisbet missed Hibs' draw with Dundee on Sunday through illness but has been linked with a move to Celtic as part of an exchange involving Leigh Griffiths heading back to the capital.
Jack Ross cooled any talks of a deal as he branded the speculation "nonsense" while Ange Postecoglou was coy on talks of a transfer as he said it was "in the basket of uncertainty".
Hartson is a fan of Nisbet, but was keen to remind fans that he remains unproven in terms of playing for an Old Firm side, while Griffiths has previously shown his capability in the role.
Discussing the transfer speculation saga, Hartson said: “He’s a good player. He’s not played at this level, while Griffiths has produced at this level.
“So it’s not as simple as saying Nisbet would be great and Griff can go back to Hibs.
“A few punters believe Griffiths still has a part to play. If Celtic do lose Edouard then they’ll need to buy another striker anyway as Ajeti doesn’t look good enough and Griffiths has had his issues.
“He does score goals, but I don’t know. He’s brought a lot of himself at times but I still like him as a player.
“I like Nisbet. He scored 14 goals last year and when Celtic come calling he would love that I’m sure.
“But he’s important to Jack Ross at Hibs. He helped then finish third last season and they will be aiming for that again. They won’t want to lose him.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here