Feathery phraseology
There’s always plenty of feathery phraseology at The Open. Birdies here, eagles there, seagull s*** everywhere. To combat the pesky nuisance of those giant St Andrews gulls, which circle above the Old Course spectator village with squawking Hitchcockian menace, The R&A top brass have employed the services of an Indian eagle owl known as Sage.
With its beady eyes and fierce talons, Sage is a dab hand at scaring off those mischievous, greedy gulls. Being a man of learned ornithology, the diarist engaged in an erudite blether with said owl’s handler. “Are you aware of Bubo bengalesis?,” he asked. “Didn’t he miss the cut in last year’s Open?”, I said with no appreciation at all of Sage’s scientific name. Given that we are at the home of golf, the diarist suggested that Sage should be re-christened Owl’d Tom Morris?
Food for thought
The golf writers are a hungry old lot as we feed the cogs and pistons of relentless Open industry. One of the diarist’s colleagues shovels so much grub away, he’s actually discovered a meal between breakfast and brunch. Our American friends, meanwhile, remain somewhat intrigued by the offerings in the media canteen. “Shepherd’s Pie?,” muttered one US scribe. “You guys sure eat some weird ass s***.” This from a nation that gave us the abomination that is Squeezy Cheese.
Army veterans complete march
An epic army veteran-led relay challenge to raise funds for sick and wounded personnel finished in St Andrews yesterday. The On Course to The Open team, which was made up of a 55-person squad, have carried a pin flag all the way from Royal St George’s in Kent to the home of golf. It’s been a journey of some 1500km. About the same distance, then, that the diarist has to walk from the press centre to the media car park.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here