LAST season in the URC, Edinburgh won five of their first seven matches in a run of fixtures that for a time took them to the top of the table. Just one of the seven, away to Benetton, was a defeat, with the other a home draw with the Stormers.
This season, after just four matches, they have already lost three. Far from closing in on the summit, they are in the lower half of the league, with Friday night’s 22-19 home defeat by the Lions having left them in ninth place before yesterday’s games.
There are a couple of mitigating factors in that reversal of fortunes. First, the fixture list has been altogether less benign. And second, the South African sides, who took a while to get up to speed on their introduction to the league, have hit the ground running this time round.
Nonetheless, for a team with serious ambitions of bettering last season’s quarter-final exit, the consecutive defeats by the Bulls, Stormers and Lions have to be a real concern. Since thumping the Dragons 44-6 in their first game of the season, the capital club have picked up just three bonus points in
defeat – one on Friday at the DAM Health Stadium and another two when they lost 33-31 to the Bulls in Johannesburg. Their other match was a 34-18 loss to the Stormers, last season’s champions, in Cape Town.
Edinburgh looked sharp enough in attack against the Lions, and Darcy Graham was once more in excellent form as he scored his sixth try in four games. Bill Mata and Ben Muncaster also touched down as the home team took leads of 5-0, 12-5 and 19-12, with Emiliano Boffelli
converting two. But the South Africans hit back each time with three tries and two conversions of their own, before a late penalty from stand-off Gianni Lombard gave them the victory.
It was a fiercely physical contest, one which the Lions arguably deserved to win thanks to their ability to stay in the fight even when under heavy pressure and behind on the scoreboard. Nonetheless, it was one which Edinburgh should have won but for their own shortcomings, according to lock forward Glen Young.
“I think we lost the game ourselves,” he said. “We had a lot of good moments, but ultimately we weren’t good enough in our 22 at defending our own line. We let in some cheap tries, and if you do that against teams like the Lions you’re always going to struggle.
“Ultimately it’s not good enough. We need to address those little soft moments where we’re letting their boys into the game. I think for 70 minutes we were there or thereabouts, but there were just a few soft moments which we can’t let happen.
“It comes down to being clinical. That’s what Mike [Blair, the head coach] said after the game. We’ve got to have our foot on the throat for 80 minutes but we didn’t.
“We’ve played South African teams three weeks in a row and they are big physical boys. It’s been a good test for us to see where we are at physically, but we’ve taken a few knocks. It was tough going.”
Blair himself offered a similar verdict, praising the Lions but insisting his own team had to look at their shortcomings.
“We’ve had two very tough away games against South African opposition where I thought we played well,” he said. “We had a game here where we did some good stuff, but we’re going to have to have a look at what we’re doing, because we should be capitalising more on the territory we had in the second half.
“Credit to the Lions for sticking in there. They got their danders up and they created a lot of energy and had a lot of trust in what they were trying to do. I thought they were excellent. The Lions have won three games on the trot away from home and they are the perceived weakest South African team, so this is a tough league.”
New re-signing Duhan van der Merwe should be available for Saturday’s home game against Benetton. But Graham, Hamish Watson and Stuart McInally are among the doubts after coming off injured on Friday night, while summer signing Wes Goosen may need another week to complete his rehab from a calf injury.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here