There’s no avoiding the ageing process. Unless, of course, you’re Sir Cliff Richard, whose use of an elaborate array of moisturisers, grouts, elixirs, joists and a cast iron truss will no doubt have him posing seductively for annual calendars well into his 137th year.
As for us mere mortals? Well, as I shuffled, skited and doddered along the ice the other day, with all the elegance of Frankenstein’s monster trying to recreate Torvill & Dean’s Bolero, my thoughts turned to an exchange among colleagues on the subject of our advancing years. “I think Nick must be pushing 47,” suggested a younger associate. “Good grief, he looks like he’s dragging it,” replied the sports editor with a withering snort.
It's been a sair auld fecht. In the golfing world, meanwhile, the fight goes on for supremacy in the professional game’s upper echelons. Yes, I know you’re probably sick to the back teeth of hearing about LIV Golf this and LIV Golf that but a recent New York Times report on confidential documents relating to a LIV blueprint devised by a consultancy firm shed some intriguing light on the Saudi Arabian quest to build a profitable, robust breakaway league.
To the casual observer, the LIV business model would appear about as sustainable as the strategic thinking behind the inflatable dartboard. Let’s face it, anyone offering Pat Perez $10 million to sign up must be off their gold-plated trolley. The sifting of said documents led to the conclusion by the New York Times that the “benchmarks for success bordered on the fantastical.” Funnily enough, that sounds like the same phrase used to sum up this correspondent’s annual appraisal.
In order to be successful, a new league would need to sign “each of the world’s top 12 golfers, attract sponsors to an unproven product and land television deals for a sport with a declining viewership all without significant retaliation from the PGA Tour it would be plundering.”
While LIV and its bottomless pit of cash has attracted a number of marquee names – the snaring of Open champion Cameron Smith was a major coup – it’s quite clear that the series falls short on all the criteria laid out above despite its rapid ascent to prominence in 2022.
Even folk with a scant knowledge of this whole saga could’ve told you that in order for such a bold rebellion to have a chance of long-term legitimacy, it would’ve needed the two biggest draws in golf – Tiger Woods and Rory McIlroy – to jump on the gravy train.
That duo, of course, declared from the outset that they wouldn’t touch LIV with the entire barge let alone the bargepole. Even though Woods was reportedly offered around $800 million to join, the multiple major champion was not for deserting and, along with McIlroy, has become one of the most vigorous anti-LIV voices.
Interestingly, the consultancy firm’s plan, named ‘Project Wedge’, also outlined possible eventualities for the LIV Golf series. In its most successful prediction, LIV would have projected revenue of at least $1.4 billion a year in 2028. On the other side of the ball marker, the doomsday scenario is that it could be facing losses of $355 million in the same year.
It’s all what-ifs and maybes, of course, and for the time being, the Saudi sovereign wealth fund will continue to plough frightening sums into a crusade that has yet to convince that it is competitively or commercially valid. The man and woman down at the local golf club will probably be aware that the LIV Series exists but that may just be down to the sheer level of well-documented disruption it has caused rather than the product it is promoting and producing on the course.
Can you – yes, you reading this with your cup of tea and saucerful of Scotch Abernethy biscuits – recount any of the actual golfing stories from the various LIV events this season? I bet you didn’t expect to be suddenly put on the spot like that eh? Look, the shock has made you slooter tea and biscuits down your front. Anyway, I’ll bet another saucerful of those delightful dunkers that there’s a good chance you couldn’t regale me with a defining golf tale from the LIV campaign beyond the relentless speculation surrounding players defecting from the established tours.
LIV remains a story because of the tumult it has created but that needs to change if it is to be successful. There has been a novelty factor too but if the golf – the core product - generates minimal interest then the whole thing risks slithering into the irrelevant realms of an expensive, indulgent folly.
AND ANOTHER THING
A little plug here for my dear golf writing colleague Lewine Mair and her new book, ‘Tapping Feet: A double-take on care homes and dementia’. Lewine’s late husband was the well-kent Norman Mair, the former Scotland rugby and cricket player who was also a wonderful, authoritative sports writer of inimitable flair. Norman’s final two years were spent in care homes as dementia tightened its pitilessly cruel grip. Lewine reflects on her family’s journey with poignancy, colour and a lightness of touch which illuminate the heart-warming moments that occasionally emerged amid the harrowing ravages of this awful condition.
READ MORE FROM NICK:
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here