MICHAEL BEALE has praised referee John Beaton for his handling of the Old Firm clash following another round of VAR comments and controversies in recent days.
Celtic left it late to snatch a point at Ibrox as a Kyogo Furuhashi effort denied Beale's side after goals from Ryan Kent and James Tavernier had cancelled out Daizen Maeda's early opener.
But the visitors were left incensed at Beaton's call not to award a penalty when the ball struck the hand of Connor Goldson as he protected his face from a close-range Carl Starfelt strike.
The fall-out this week has been typical of Scottish football and life in the Old Firm goldfish bowl but Beale believes the on-field team and VAR officials can be pleased with their efforts on derby day.
Beale said: "We all wanted it, now we’ve got it and we’re not sure if we want it or not. I think that’s where we’re at.
"At the time, I don’t see it till after the game so I wasn’t sure at the time whether it was or wasn’t.
"I seen one player for them appeal for it, not everybody, and then you read the law and the law says one thing and it’s how that law is then perceived. The officials on the day perceived it a certain way.
READ MORE: Rangers take another small step on Michael Beale learning curve
"I thought, actually, John and the officials that were there had a good game. For an Old Firm game I thought they managed the game really well.
"He didn’t bang cards out early. I thought it was a cracking game, two teams went head-to-head for the full 90 minutes and I thought John and the other officials managed the game very well.
"I actually thought that when the game ended. There’s always some things you think that go for you or against you but when you read the rule it seems like they got it to the letter."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel