DEREK MCINNES was proud of his players’ efforts as Kilmarnock fell to a valiant defeat to Celtic at Hampden, but the Killie manager was angry that his side were denied a penalty late on by referee Willie Collum, and says he doesn't understand why VAR didn't intervene.
The Killie bench, players and supporters were all up in arms as Giorgos Giakoumakis clambered with Joe Wright in the area late on with the score at 1-0, just before the Greek striker hit Celtic’s killer second goal.
And a furious McInnes was perplexed that the VAR official didn't correct referee Collum's on-field decision not to award a spot-kick for the incident.
“Joe Wright’s been man-handled and there’s no way Giakoumakis can get to the ball,” McInnes said.
“But he’s come through him, two arms round him…it’s a penalty kick. The referee’s got a brilliant view, I don’t understand why it’s not a penalty.
“What’s the point in me speaking to the referee? Seriously, what is the point? VAR should be speaking to the referee. That’s the conversation that needs to be had – not me after the event, Celtic are through to a final.
“Pre-VAR, post-VAR, that’s a penalty kick. And how we can’t get to the right decision…
“Giakoumakis just gets a bit excitable. He’s clumsy, it’s a striker’s challenge. He stumbles into the back of Joe Wright, with two arms round his waist. It’s a penalty kick.”
“Whoever’s on the VAR has to be big enough to say to the referee ‘Are you sure you’ve seen this right, you need to come and see this again.’
“You’ve got a really experienced referee there and you need experienced people to ask th experienced referee to have another look at it.
“What does it take? 30 seconds? I think if he sees it again he’ll give a penalty.”
Despite his disappointment, McInnes said his team showed what they were made of in their performance.
“So many of our players were turning up at Hampden for the first time, and you’re never really sure…" he said.
“I said I would learn a lot about my team today, and I’m delighted with the courage and the personality."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel