This article was first published yesterday in our bespoke Sports newsletter The Fixture. You can sign up in seconds to receive it straight to your inbox every weekday here.
In the 1970s, BBC2 used to provide information programmes in conjunction with the Open University which were broadcast in the early hours of a Sunday morning at a time when, let's face it, most students were likely only crawling into their beds rather than out of them. To this infant's eyes and ears this was a cornucopia of beige.
Four Oxbridge intellectuals would sit around a coffee table, often sporting a combination of turtle neck sweaters and wispy beards or shirts with flared collars and impossibly bushy sideburns – sometimes the very erudite would be equipped with all four. These sages would postulate over philosophical questions using words such as solipsistic and Leviathan, invoking names such as Socrates and Aristotle. To this confused youngster it was incomprehensible gobbledygook which is the expression that now comes to mind anytime The Fixture finds himself watching The Transfer Show on Sky Sports. And let's not forget its siblings Good Morning Transfers and Transfer Talk (I think we're spotting a theme here) which I assume, if I'd ever bothered to watch them, would simply be a rehash of everything that already appears on The Transfer Show. It generates a fair degree of navel gazing I can tell you.
The recurring question “what the hell is this” springs to mind as a perfectly manicured quartet (usually three men and a woman) ruminate over the day's transfer speculation as if they are discussing quantum physics. Yesterday, The Transfer Show went global, dipping into the collective minds of 'transfer experts' from Italy, the UK and Germany. The German had clearly taken his sartorial lead from Patrick McGoohan's character in The Prisoner as he sat on a swivel chair bedecked in a grey leather bomber jacket and matching knitted polo neck. The 'experts' had news about deals that may or may not happen – for that's usually how this schtick works. There was a good, old-fashioned hijacking as Arnaut Danjuma did all the newly-signed-football-media things at Everton before taking one look at the Premier League table and deciding he was off to Spurs instead – is there a crime more heinous in the esoteric world of football transfers as “doing all the club media and the socials” before buggering off elsewhere? Meanwhile, we had Todd Cantwell playing a game of 'yes-no' with himself as he was interviewed inside the Ibrox trophy room during his unveiling by Rangers. And there was talk of 'late swoops' by Newcastle and Arsenal for Anthony Gordon and Amadou Onana.
The experts then offered their take on various other deals that may or not be done which prompted another question: is there a school for transfer experts, a qualification to be gained after studying for four years at university or is it just about having a well-organised Tweetdeck feed and alerts switched on for the heavy hitters such as 'Di Marzio' and 'Fab', the absolute doyens of transfer speculation.
Ultimately, though, the main source of consternation The Fixture feels when watching any of Sky's transfer offerings is this: who, exactly, is the target audience for the programmes?
Is it solely people like me who spend their time baffled at what it is they are meant to be watching or has there been some market research done which confirms that the only type of programmes viewers want to watch is endless loops of the same information being spun in many different ways?
Socrates and Aristotle as two of the founding fathers of education would no doubt despair. The transfer experts, on the other hand, might tell you that Socrates once played for Brazil and Corinthians but is no longer on the market following his death in 2011 and that Aristotle is generating plenty of interest from clubs in the Bundesliga and is "a deal that could move quickly if things fall into place".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here