SUPPORT for legalising the use of pyrotechnics by fans at football matches is growing in Germany amid widespread unhappiness over heavy-handed policing and high financial penalties following a successful trial at a Hamburg game.
Representatives of several Hamburg ultras groups – under the watchful eye of trained pyrotechnicians and the local fire brigade - set off 10 smoke pots in front of the North Stand in the Volksparkstadion before a Bundesliga 2 fixture against Karlsruhe in the February of 2020.
The display, which was approved by both the German Football Association and local authorities, took place as both teams walked out onto the park ahead of kick-off, passed off without incident and was declared a resounding success by those involved afterwards.
"That was a good first step," said Hamburg chief executive Bernd Hoffmann. "We will now reflect on this with all networks and people involved. And then we'll see what the next steps might look like. It cannot be that something which is commonplace at every music concert is then not allowed at football.”
The experiment has not been repeated since – but earlier this season Werder Bremen president Hubertus Hess-Grunewald spoke in favour of allowing the use of flares and smoke canisters in a controlled environment in the German game.
Hess-Grunewald, whose club is involved in a legal dispute with the German Football Association and the Bremen state over the high cost of policing games, is concerned about the treatment of ordinary supporters by police who are attempting to stop the use pyrotechnics.
"There is a form of police repression that we cannot approve of in our free democratic state,” said Hess-Grunewald after searches of Werder fans who had travelled to the opening Bundesliga match of the season against VfL Wolfgsburg at the Volkswagen Arena in August caused a furore.
“I advocate a political corrective. We must talk about a controlled and legal use of pyrotechnics. The controlled burning of pyro could be a way out of an escalating spiral of repression and criminalisation.”
Werder tested so-called “cold” flares which were developed by a Brondby fan in Denmark back in 2019 in the presence of security staff and the fire service. However, it was found the flares still emitted toxic gases and burned at temperatures of up to 500 degress Celsius.
There is currently a complete ban on the use of flares, fireworks and smoke bombs inside stadiums in Germany and breaches of the rules can lead to clubs being hit with large fines and other sanctions being imposed by the national association.
The 2020 trial arose out of widespread unhappiness at fines totalling €1,056,525 being handed during the 2018/19 season and Hamburg, who were the worst offenders in the country, having to pay out €294,000.
MATTHEW LINDSAY'S PYRO INVESTIGATION:
- The Norwegian view
- The German view
- The Asthma UK view
- The PFA Scotland view
- The disabled fan view
- Call for safe pyro debate
Supporters of “legal pyro” argue that fewer injuries have been caused by flares and smoke bombs at matches than by the pepper spray that police have used on fans who have set them off in the stands.
Meanwhile, football in Portugal appears to be heading in completely the opposite direction.
The government there is working on legislation called the Legal Regime for Explosives and Dangerous Substances and anyone who takes a pyrotechnic into a football match could face a jail term of up to five years if it is passed in parliament.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here