This article was first published today in our bespoke Sports newsletter The Fixture. You can sign up in seconds to receive it straight to your inbox every weekday here.
An example of how fractured the relationship between LIV Golf and the PGA Tour has come as details from an antitrust hearing case were reported on Friday.
“We’ve learned that the [PGA] Tour has orchestrated a grassroots campaign against LIV Golf,” John Quinn, the LIV Golf attorney, said.
“They chartered a private jet to fly protestors — including, shockingly, members of [9/11 Justice] and victims of 9/11 — to conduct these protests in effect to actually create this Saudi taint.”
For now, it is a conflict which shows no signs of abating and amid the ongoing slanging match between LIV and the PGA, The Masters became something of a bellwether for the respective state of the two tours.
There have been plenty of attempts to pour scorn on LIV Golf and how it might stifle the appetite of the big guns who now ply their trade in what appears to be a less competitive environment.
Yet, those claims were debunked by the showings of Phil Mickelson and Brooks Koepka at Augusta, even if some wags were suggesting in the aftermath of the latter's final round – a 75-over par 72 – that his relative collapse was understandable since he only plays 54-hole tournaments now – a nod to the truncated format in LIV Golf.
Of course, it takes little reminding that the logic behind the reasons for doing so could be seen in the prize money Mickelson and Koepka took home for their week's efforts in Georgia.
The two men pocketed $1.59 million, some way off the $4m that Koepka earned for winning the most recent LIV event in Orlando. Meanwhile, Mickelson became the oldest player in Masters history to have a top-five finish and his final round of 65 was the lowest Masters round ever for a player over the age of 50 – so, in all, it turned out to be a respectable showing for LIV Golf.
But the main takeaway from a memorable weekend – aside from the conclusion that Jon Rahm is a relentless, ice-cool golfer – was the sense of golf's loss.
Here was a glimpse of what we have been missing ever since the defectors left for the LIV Tour last year. Certainly, it was hard to escape the conclusion that it is a great shame that punters are denied the opportunity to watch the best in the game going toe-to-toe each week.
Perhaps the counter argument is that the scarcity of these such occasions in the golfing calendar has given them a new-found lustre to them but that wasn't Koepka's view when asked about it on the second day of play.
Quizzed on whether he might have had a different outlook on joining the LIV Tour when he was battling a career-threatening knee injury last year he expressed remarkable candour.
“Honestly, yeah, probably, if I’m being completely honest,” he said. “I think it would have been.”
It was the first time any of the participants on LIV had given anything approaching a dissenting voice about their presence there and it raised a wider question about how long the whole enterprise might last.
There is, of course, the small matter of lucrative, watertight contracts standing in the way and the belief that the open warfare that the game has experienced in the past 12 months or so has created fissures that might take some time to heal should some form of rapprochement ever materialise.
However, Koepka admitted that he missed pitting his skills against Rahm, the eventual winner at Augusta, and those such as Rory McIlroy.
It quickly became clear that he's not the only one.
Why are you making commenting on HeraldScotland only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here