Simon Jordan has two-footed Rangers legend Kris Boyd over his punditry on Sky Sports in last night's 2-1 defeat to Aberdeen.
The former striker filleted his former club in an epic rant after they dropped nine points behind in the title race.
In an epic diatribe, Boyd said Philippe Clement should leave the club while stating that the Dons were a "better team than Rangers, better manager than Rangers and with better recruitment" and adding "they have downgraded in every position."
And talkSPORT pundit Jordan, the former owner of Premier League side Crystal Palace wasn't impressed with the passionate comments.
He said: "I know they do (trail in the league) but, in isolation, this game which is creating the headline and reaction from Kris Boyd is an unfair analysis. Go back behind that and see what is happening, what was their transfer policy in the summer? What funds does he have available?
"There has to be a raft of reasons, rather than emotive outbursts from pundits about what is happening at Rangers. If, it is indeed, that Clement has gone from hero to zero, with nothing in between, with no reason behind it, he isn't good enough, he isn't the person people thought he was
Read more:
"On one hand, you have got people saying 'get your bloody nose back in the boardroom and away from the football operations, we don't want you here, leave the football people to run it'. On the other hand, it's 'we don't have a CEO, we don't have a chairman', and that's the reason why it is rudderless.
"Clement's side are not not functioning on the field because there is no chairman, or CEO, it might be nice to impart wisdom, but most CEOs are bag carriers, most CEOs, in football, wouldn't get jobs in commercial business around the world. I don't see them as leaders. Most chairman are detached from the business anyway."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel