DUNCAN SCOTT said there were no excuses after Great Britain surprisingly lost their grip on the 4x200 freestyle title at swimming’s world champion-ships in Gwangju as they were squeezed into fifth, writes Mark Woods.
Chasing a third successive relay gold in the event, the 2016 Olympic silver medallists lay third after the Scot’s opening leg. But Calum Jervis, Tom Dean and James Guy’s efforts came up short as GB ended just six-hundredths of a second off the podium with Australia wrestling away their crown in a time of 7:00.85 with Russia beating the USA to silver.
“I’m delighted with my leg,” said Scott, who is set for one final crack at doubling his medal haul in tomorrow’s 4x100 medley relay. “But at the end of the day I’m just part of the team and everybody was doing their individual legs and I don’t think anyone had a bad swim. We swam very fast. It’s just that was a very fast race. It was a really solid effort and we’ve got to walk away proud.”
Luke Greenbank added to the British medal tally with bronze in the 200m backstroke with a personal best of 1.55.85 as Russia’s Evgeny Rylov eased to gold. His compatriot Yuliya Efimova won the women’s 200m breaststroke with Molly Renshaw fifth, while English prospect Freya Anderson came eighth in the 100m freestyle as the USA’s Simone Manuel claimed victory.
Ben Proud, dethroned as 50m butterfly champion, earned a shot at redemption in today’s 50m freestyle final by coming second in his semi-final, while Guy will look to beat his bronze of two years ago in Budapest in the 100m butterfly after sealing his spot in the final with Caeleb Dressel of the USA clocking 49.50 secs in the semi to smash Michael Phelps’ world record which had stood for 10 years.
It was one of three world bests to fall with 17-year-old American Regan Smith swimming 2:03.35 in the 200m backstroke semis and Russia’s Anton Chupkov defending his title in the 200m breaststroke by snatching gold in 2:06.12.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here