JAMIE MURRAY suffered double quarter-final disappointment at the Australian Open yesterday.
First the Scot and Brazilian partner Bruno Soares were beaten 6-3, 6-4 in the men's doubles by 2017 champions Henri Kontinen and John Peers, then Murray and Bethanie Mattek-Sands lost in the last eight of the mixed doubles.
The former was the biggest disappointment, and losing in the last eight of slams has become a bit of a recurring theme for Murray and Soares, who reached that stage for the fifth time since winning their second slam together at the US Open in 2016 but once again fell short.
Murray dropped serve at the start of the contest and that set the tone, with Finn Kontinen and Australian Peers the stronger team throughout.
Murray said: "It was a tough day, obviously, to lose both matches.
"I think the other guys played a good match, an aggressive match. Obviously I lost my serve at the start, which helped them settle down.
"We were under pressure a lot of the match. It was just one of those days where you get outplayed a bit. It was frustrating.
"The last three slams we've done the quarter-finals, so it's not like we're turning up and losing first round.
"A big goal for us this year was to try to win a grand slam. One shot down. We'll keep trying to do better."
Murray and American Mattek-Sands won the US Open title last summer, the Scot's third slam in the last two years, but were beaten 6-2, 7-6 (5) by Australian pair Astra Sharma and John-Patrick Smith.
Liverpool's Neal Skupski is through to his first slam semi-final, though, after a 6-1, 4-6, 11-9 victory with Spain's Maria Jose Martinez Sanchez over top seeds Gaby Dabrowski and Mate Pavic.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here