The inaugural UEFA Nations League was won by Portugal, with Holland finishing runners-up and England claiming third place with a penalty shoot-out victory over Switzerland.
Here, Press Association Sport looks at the purpose of the competition and its implications for Euro 2020 qualifying.
Portugal won the Nations League, what does that mean?
Aside from picking up the trophy, essentially not much – yet. They still have to go through qualifying for the European Championships. They are currently third in Group B but have played one match fewer than Ukraine and Luxembourg.
So what was the point of it all?
The Nations League provides a second chance of Euro 2020 qualification should teams not progress as one of the top two sides in the 10 groups already under way. At the end of regular qualifying, each of the already-decided Nations League’s four group winners in Leagues A, B, C and D go into their own play-off for one place at the Euros. If the winners are already qualified through the traditional method, their place goes to the next best-placed team who do not have a Euro 2020 place.
It is not all over for the Nations League then?
No. In March, when Euro 2020 qualification is over, we will return to those Nations League tables and select four teams from each of the groups in League A, B, C and D, applying the previously-mentioned criteria. Four new mini-leagues will be formed from the 16 teams and each league will have its own path to Euro 2020, consisting of two single-leg semi-finals and one final. The better-ranked team will have home advantage for the semi-final. A draw to determine potential home teams for each final will be made on November 22.
When will England play in the Nations League again?
That remains to be seen. If they do not finish in the top two of Group A in Euro 2020 qualifying (they are currently top of their five-team table featuring Czech Republic, Kosovo, Bulgaria and Montenegro with a three-point lead after two matches) then they will be in the Nations League play-offs. Semi-finals take place between March 26 and 28, with finals being held on March 29-31.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here