Max Faulkner’s supreme peacocking would not even ruffle the odd feather today, but back in 1951 that braggadocio had his foes tearing out their hair.
The last man to win The Open at Royal Portrush, Faulkner dressed in bold, brash colours, boasting of his abilities in a fashion deemed disruptive for the times.
Englishman Faulkner took up boxing in the RAF during World War Two, with a perforated ear drum service wound altering his outlook.
By the time he prevailed in that 1951 Open in Northern Ireland, Faulkner cared little for public opinion, or how his antics were received.
His pinks and purples would not even stretch a seam in the modern game, but caused controversy when he landed his solitary major title.
Post-war Britain simply did not know how to respond to Faulkner’s ever-rising confidence, especially his famed autograph en route to that Open triumph.
Midway through the tournament, Faulker penned his moniker for a young fan, who told him he would lift the claret jug.
So he added the postscript Open champion 1951, in an outrageous flourish that won him few friends on the links.
“I asked him for a pen, I put ‘Max Faulkner, Open Champion 1951’, and then looked at it before giving it back,” said Faulkner.
“As I walked to the tee it kept appearing in front of me: ‘Open champion 1951’.
“It certainly looked good.”
So the more he thought about his own tagline, trying it on for size, the more comfortable he became in wearing the title.
When by rights he ought to have been hoisted by his own petard, instead that cocky prediction simply drove him home.
His victory frustrated the establishment, but stood as the only Open victory for a Brit between Henry Cotton in 1948 and Tony Jacklin in 1969.
How the home faithful would love the likes of Rory McIlroy to storm home, and in quite such entertaining fashion this week.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here