England have mounted a staunch defence of Eddie Jones’ training approach following claims players feared national camps.
Former Wasps lock Kearnan Myall opened up on his struggles with depression this week, claiming several England stars “dread” meeting up for training with the Test team.
Attack coach Scott Wisemantel has insisted, however, that England’s stars are exposed extensive and sympathetic pastoral care, even amid head coach Jones’ famed taskmaster methods.
“We’ve had no complaints at all through the RPA (Rugby Players’ Association),” said Wisemantel.
“There’s never been a complaint. I feel for the player, but it was a long time before my time here.
“I know the programme that Eddie runs here is intense, but it’s well-structured. There is time for players to refresh, to get their heads right, to recover. It’s a well-balanced programme, it really is.
“Eddie tries to vary the programme from week to week with little subtle changes and player socials. There’s also the downtime. I think it’s a very well-balanced programme.”
Confirming team manager Richard Hill as the first point of contact if players admitted struggling mentally, Wisemantel insisted any problems would be treated with the utmost respect and seriousness.
“Without a doubt (issues would be handled sympathetically),” he added. “Player welfare is important.
“It is not just the physical side, it is also the mental side.
“You look at sport in general, the stakes are high, the pressure is high at the pointy end of the stick. It is intense.
“It is providing coping mechanisms around it for players. Everyone is different.
“Within this squad it is not one size fits all, there is enough scope for every individual to find their own niche, their own down time and how they cope with the demands of playing international rugby.
“If a player is under pressure or something has been said, be mindful and address it rather than leave it as an elephant in the room.
“There is nothing wrong with saying, ‘Are you OK?’ and then putting the appropriate steps in for the player because it is really important.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here