Margaret Court received a muted reception as she was presented with a replica trophy at the Australian Open to make the 50th anniversary of her calendar Grand Slam.
Court’s outspoken and controversial views on LGBTIQ issues have made her tennis’ most polarising figure, and tournament organisers were put in a difficult position over how to mark the occasion.
Tennis Australia put out a statement ahead of the event saying they would recognise Court’s achievements, including a record 24 grand slam singles titles, while reiterating that her views were not compatible with the organisation’s ethos.
The most public event to mark the occasion was a presentation made to Court by Rod Laver, who received star treatment last year on the 50th anniversary of his Grand Slam, on the arena that bears his name ahead of the fourth-round clash between Nick Kyrgios and Rafael Nadal.
Organisers would have breathed a sigh of relief as Court’s presence was met with polite, if hardly enthusiastic applause, and a smattering of whistles.
A handful of rainbow flags were held up around the arena but that was as far as any protest went.
John McEnroe did not mince his words about Court speaking on Eurosport, describing her as Australian tennis’ “crazy aunt”, and saying the only thing longer than her list of tennis achievements was “her list of offensive and homophobic statements”.
Serena Williams’ third-round loss to Wang Qiang means she is still one slam title behind Court, and McEnroe added: “Serena, do me a favour, get two more grand slams this year and get to 25 so we can leave Margaret Court and her offensive views in the past, where they both belong.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here