Britain’s Joe Salisbury will play in his first grand slam final after he and American partner Rajeev Ram defeated Kazakh duo Alexander Bublik and Mikhail Kukushkin at the Australian Open.
Salisbury and Ram, the 11th seeds in the men’s doubles, recovered from losing their first set of the tournament to win 4-6 6-3 6-4.
They looked in trouble when Salisbury dropped his serve early in the third set but Bublik, an unpredictable player at the best of times, served eight double faults across two games, five in the penultimate one, and Ram served it out.
Salisbury said of Bublik’s largesse: “That was a bit of a shock. I know he is renowned for going for big second serves. It was very tough serving at that end, but we were surprised he kept going for it. We will take it.”
Salisbury made the last four at Wimbledon two years ago as a wild card alongside Dane Frederik Nielsen, but he and Ram have since established themselves among the top doubles teams in the world, qualifying for the ATP Finals in November.
This is another big step forward, and 27-year-old Salisbury said: “It’s my first grand slam final, I am really excited.
“It’s almost a bit of relief to get through that. Even though it was our first grand slam semi-final together, we were probably favourites going into that match and it wasn’t the highest quality tennis throughout.
“We had to fight hard. We weren’t playing our best, but we stayed together as a team, supported each other, hung in there until the end. We are really happy and looking forward to the final.”
In the final on Sunday, Salisbury and Ram will face Australian wild cards Max Purcell and Luke Saville, who continued their brilliant run with a 6-7 (7) 6-3 6-4 victory over fourth seeds Ivan Dodig and Filip Polasek.
Salisbury and Ram will go into the clash as favourites, and the Londoner said of the prospect of winning a first slam title: “It’s something I have always dreamed about doing,
“It’s the pinnacle of our sport. It would be unbelievable. That’s the goal of everything we are doing.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here