Scott Parker described Aleksandar Mitrovic as “vitally important” for Fulham after his goal sent them into the third round of the Carabao Cup in a 1-0 victory over Ipswich.
Named as stand-in captain on his 26th birthday, the Serbian capped off the day with a powerful header past goalkeeper David Cornell to give his side a crucial first-half lead.
The goal was also Mitrovic’s 50th for the club on his 102nd appearance since joining Fulham from Newcastle – initially on loan – in January 2018.
“His last start was Wigan away, which was some months ago,” Parker said when asked about the striker’s fitness, after he started on the bench during a 3-0 defeat to Arsenal on Saturday.
“For him to get valuable minutes, score a goal, work hard for the team is vitally important for us, he’s going to be a vitally important cog for us.”
Parker added: “When the ball comes in at that quality I was standing there thinking ‘if that’s on his head it’s going in’. That’s exactly where he finishes.”
The Fulham side also had a number of debutants, including Alphonse Areola, Mario Lemina, Kenny Tete and Antonee Robinson, and Parker also hailed their contributions.
“The debutants did very well,” he said. “The keeper didn’t have a lot to do, but both full-backs were outstanding. They provided a good attacking threat with a lot of speed and put good crosses into the box. The goal came from that. And Lemina showed his quality.
“They showed what they are going to bring to this team with their quality.”
Paul Lambert praised his Ipswich side for a close-fought contest despite the defeat.
Speaking after the game, he said: “I couldn’t have asked any more. We were, I thought, really good.
“We saw Fulham’s team sheet and we put a strong side out there, but they have so many great players there Fulham – they’re a really great team and really strong.
“But we went toe to toe with them and I thought we were excellent, some good play, some guys playing for the first time which was really good and every one of them faced it today, so I thought there were some really good performances.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here