Graeme Swann starred as England avoided a humiliating 7-0 one-day series whitewash against Australia on this day in 2009.
Spinner Swann took five for 28 as the tourists were dismissed for 176 at Chester-le-Street, despite a half-century from captain Ricky Ponting.
England still managed to make a meal of chasing a modest total, slumping from 106 without loss to 141 for five before Paul Collingwood and Tim Bresnan dragged them to an inglorious four-wicket victory.
Swann blamed England’s lacklustre performances in the one-day series on the matches being played in the aftermath of their 2-1 Ashes triumph.
“It has been the classic ‘after the Lord Mayor’s show’, it really has felt like that,” Swann said.
“It’s good that we managed to grab a win at the end, 7-0 would have been embarrassing, it’s bad enough at 6-1 but 7-0 would have been a world record and a horrible world record to hold. We’re happy we’ve avoided that.”
Player of the match Swann helped put the hosts in control of the contest by claiming the wickets of Ponting, Cameron White, James Hopes, Mitchell Johnson and Brett Lee.
Skipper Andrew Strauss (47) and Joe Denly (53) then gave England a solid platform with a 106-run opening partnership, prior to the significant wobble among the middle order.
Although the win ensured England escaped an unprecedented series drubbing, another below-par batting performance – Strauss and Denly aside – gave them little cause for optimism ahead of flying to South Africa for the ICC Champions Trophy.
Strauss said: “We need to be honest and not settle for mediocrity.
“Anyone who has been part of this series does not want to go through this experience again.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here