Former Manchester City midfielder Dietmar Hamann thinks the team are past their best under Pep Guardiola and believes the Spaniard is lucky to still be manager.
City were well off the pace in the defence of their Premier League title last season, while what was viewed by many as a golden chance for possible Champions League success was ended by Lyon in the quarter finals.
Guardiola has enjoyed huge domestic success during his four years in charge at the Etihad, winning six major trophies, but City continue to disappoint in Europe, failing to make it past the last eight under Guardiola.
This season, City have already dropped seven points in their opening five Premier League games, although they have won both of their matches so far in the Champions League.
Guardiola’s contract expires at the end of the season and the 49-year-old is yet to commit his future either way, but Hamann, who played for City between 2006 and 2009, believes he could be near the end of his “cycle” at the club.
“Historically, he was at (Bayern) Munich for three years and he improved the team, but the players were happy when he left because he was so demanding,” Hamann told talkSPORT.
“I think a manager like Guardiola can’t be at a club for more than four or five years
“He’s done that at Man City and if you see the players they bring in, there is no continuity and I don’t see them improving enough with the money they’ve spent.
“I think they’ve peaked under Guardiola, I don’t see them winning the Premier League or the Champions League in the next few years.
“If you look at their record in the Champions League, any other manager would’ve been in big bother. Obviously he’s got some Barcelona history in the boardroom and maybe that’s why he’s still there.
“He didn’t reach a final with Bayern Munich, hasn’t with Man City, and if you look at the teams who did, they don’t have the same funds.
“It’s simply not good enough. If you look at the teams who beat them, I just wonder what has to happen for them to make a change.
“We don’t like managers getting sacked, but I think any other manager would be in big bother.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here