Tyson Fury shrugged off a chest infection and scored a dominant win over Dereck Chisora which paved the way for a world title tilt against Wladimir Klitschko.
Fury revealed he had been close to withdrawing from the bout after being prevented from training for three weeks, but still cruised past Chisora, who was pulled out at the end of round 10.
It marked Fury’s second win over Chisora in three years and earned him the European title, as well as regaining the vacant British crown.
Afterwards promoter Frank Warren said of a prospective fight with Klitschko: “It will happen.
“The WBO have mandated it will happen. Klitschko’s next fight is in March and after that there’s 30 days for us to negotiate with him.
“The fight will be against Tyson Fury. He goes in as the number one mandatory challenger for the WBO title.”
Chisora had lost almost every round of a low-key affair, with some boos drifting around the ExCel Arena audience prior to the fight’s conclusion.
It represented Fury’s 23rd straight professional win, and his trainer and uncle Peter Fury insisted: “Tyson will bring back a world title for Britain.
“Tyson is majorly talented and people need to wake up. Just because he’s 6ft 9, looks a bit clumsy now and then, goes in swinging when he hasn’t got his trainer in the corner – Tyson is a serious threat on a world level.”
One year later, Fury would stun Klitschko in Dusseldorf to claim the world titles, which he would subsequently regain after a much-documented battle with mental health issues.
Chisora would also continue to campaign at the top level but suffered two defeats to domestic rival Dillian Whyte and most recently, to Ukrainian rising star Oleksandr Usyk in London.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here