Adam Peaty is convinced he will head into the Tokyo Olympics in a good place after storming to victory in the men’s 100m breaststroke final in the British Swimming Selection Trials at London Aquatics Centre.
Peaty’s world-leading time of 57.39 seconds ensures he now holds the top 20 fastest times in the event and came six years after he first broke the 100m world record at the same venue.
Peaty said: “I look back on that performance when I went 57.9 and I’m a completely different person now – I’m more mature, I’m more calculated, and I know when to take risks.
“I think in the next 14 weeks we can fine-tune that. There’s so much to build on right now, and I feel we’ve got a very good foundation. I can’t really see the next 14 weeks going badly.”
Peaty and his girlfriend Eirianedd Munro announced the birth of their son George in September last year but the 26-year-old admitted that from a swimming perspective the lockdown had hit him hard.
“Covid 19 took a lot out of a lot of athletes, especially me,” Peaty added. “I’ve been to a lot of bad places and very negative places, but all I had to do was keep my eyes on the end of that tunnel.
“Who knows what competitions are going to be out there, but one thing I’m certain of is that I’ve got a pool, I’ve got a lane, and I’ve got a chance. It’s just the same two lengths of the pool that I’ve been doing since I was 10 years old.”
James Wilby, who like Peaty has already been pre-selected for the Tokyo Games, also went under the selection consideration time as he finished in second place in a time of 58.6 seconds.
World champion Duncan Scott broke Max Litchfield’s British record in the men’s 200m individual medley, building on a strong butterfly leg to finish in a time of 1:55.90.
Freya Anderson’s 1.56.80 was under the consideration time for the women’s 200m freestyle, and Aimee Willmott also went under with 4.35.70 in the women’s 400m individual medley.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here