Dan Evans admitted he did not relish the extra attention brought by his stunning upset of world number one Novak Djokovic at the Rolex Monte-Carlo Masters as he reflected on the best victory of his career.
Having arrived at the clay-court event on a run of four straight defeats and without a tour-level victory on the surface for four years, the British number one pulled off a 6-4 7-5 win over Djokovic to reach a Masters quarter-final for the first time.
Evans, who had never beaten a top-six player before, then teamed up with Neal Skupski to defeat Australian Open champions Ivan Dodig and Filip Polasek and make the last eight of the doubles.
The 30-year-old said: āObviously itās not my favourite surface. But I think the conditions have actually suited me this week. Itās not been very warm. The ball stayed low. Iām moving way better on the clay. Thatās definitely helped.
āItās difficult. Obviously a bit more attention. Not so fond of that. Just hopefully focus on tomorrow.
āObviously Iām happy. Iām still in the tournament. After the tournament, Iāll look back at what a good day it was. It was obviously an amazing feeling to win and to come through.
āSometimes itās a little embarrassing when people are saying well done too much. Thatās the way I feel. I canāt help it.ā
Djokovic had won his first 10 matches of the season but was a long way from his best, and Evans capitalised superbly.
āI felt comfortable from the outset,ā Evans said. āIn myself, I felt very good. But more importantly I didnāt feel he was being too aggressive, pushing me back too much. I was comfortable in the points. I hit my forehand well.ā
The British number one said in his interview with Amazon Prime Video that he had been fired up by Djokovic keeping him waiting ahead of the match, although he later played the comment down as a joke.
Djokovic was scathing about his performance, saying: āCongratulations to him. I mean, he deserved to win. He was a better player. Just more focused I guess and played with a better quality in the decisive moments.
āThis has been probably one of the worst matches and performances from my side I can recall in the last years. I donāt want to take anything away from his win but, from my side, I just felt awful on the court overall. Just nothing worked. Itās one of those days.
āI canāt take anything positive away from this match. Itās not the first, neither the last, loss but definitely leaves a bitter feeling exiting the court this way.ā
It was a first meeting between the two players, and Djokovic said: āHeās got a really all-around game. Heās really a nice player to watch, not a great player to play against. Lots of talent. Heās very unpredictable with his shots. He dismantled my game.ā
Djokovic was playing only his second match since winning the Australian Open in February and looked very rusty initially in cool and windy conditions, losing the first three games.
He improved significantly after that and pulled back to 4-4 but Evans did not allow his level to drop, trading brilliantly with Djokovic from the back of the court and varying the angles and pace intelligently, with his slice backhand particularly effective.
Another break of serve gave him the chance to serve for the set, and he clinched it on his third chance.
Evans would have expected a response from Djokovic and he got it, the Serbian moving into a 3-0 lead in the second set, but he still did not look entirely comfortable and back came the British player to level at 3-3.
Djokovic kept the pressure on but Evans did not buckle and, at 5-5, it was the top seed who double-faulted to hand his opponent the break.
That gave the 30-year-old the chance to serve for the win of his life and he took it to set up a clash with David Goffin.
The Belgian is not surprised to see Evans finding his feet on clay, saying: āHeās an amazing, talented player.
āI always thought that he could play on every surface. Maybe in his head he was not a clay-court player in the past, so he was not super confident on that surface.ā
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Ā
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience forĀ our loyalĀ readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Ā
That is invaluable.Ā
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalistās job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readersā comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readersā comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the āreport this postā link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here