12 Years A Slave (15)
12 Years A Slave (15)
Dir: Steve McQueen
With: Chiwetel Ejiofor, Michael Fassbender, Brad Pitt
Runtime: 134 minutes
GREAT expectations ensued when it was announced that Steve McQueen, the British director of Hunger and Shame, was adapting Solomon Northup's memoir of a free man kidnapped into slavery in 19th century America.
McQueen has duly delivered a drama that is as magnificently enraged as it is quietly, devastatingly, moving. Given its UK premiere at the London Film Festival last October, it was no surprise to find the picture nominated for 10 Baftas yesterday.
Chiwetel Ejiofor plays Northup, a family man and musician living in New York in 1841. Hired for a job in Washington, he is drugged and sent to the south. "If you want to survive," he is told, "do and say as little as possible".
So begins Northup's odyssey through innumerable circles of hell, most of them presided over by plantation owner Edwin Epps and his equally sadistic wife (Michael Fassbender and Sarah Paulson).
McQueen is unflinching in his depiction of slavery and the systematic way it tried to rob its victims of all dignity. As such, 12 Years is often a difficult watch. But what shines through the bleakness is an inextinguishable sense of the human spirit and how it survives despite the cruelties visited on it.
Fassbender, a McQueen regular by now, commands the screen as the loathsome Epps, and there are places in the cast for Paul Giamatti and Brad Pitt, also a producer of the film. The success of the picture, though, rests squarely on the shoulders of Ejiofor, and what an unforgettable performance he turns in as a man stripped to his physical and mental core.
Cinema has been no stranger to attempting to portray slavery, often with questionable results. Whatever efforts are made in future, it is hard to imagine anyone bettering McQueen's towering indictment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article