The Hunter (15)
HHH
Dir: Daniel Nettheim
With: Willem Dafoe, Sam Neill, Morgana Davies
Running time: 101 minutes
FEW words inspire more excitement among filmmakers in search of a title than "hunter", or variations thereof. From Dirk Bogarde's 1952 drama Hunted to Iranian director Rafi Pitts's The Hunter of 2010, the chase to bag the H word has been a heated one. The latest to take it up is Daniel Nettheim's Australia-set drama, starring Willem Dafoe.
You can see why the word is so sought after. It gives a film an immediate pep, a frisson of anticipation, a swish of intrigue. But Nettheim's picture, adapted from the novel by Julia Leigh, seems to deliberately run away from the drama conjured up by its title, preferring to go about its business in as low key a way as possible.
This could be a dangerous tactic, one that would run the risk of boring the audience to death if the film didn't have the twin benefits of the stunning Tasmanian scenery and Dafoe's terrific performance to recommend it. The Hunter is the kind of elegantly assembled, intelligently drawn, gently political drama of the kind that wouldn't have been out of place in the 1970s. Subtract Dafoe and the scenery and it could pass as a television movie (Nettheim's career to date has largely been in television). Add them, and Nettheim's picture is well worth your cinema tenner this weekend.
Dafoe plays Martin David, the hunter of the title. We first meet him in Paris where he is given his next mission, one that is at once as old-fashioned as a pith helmet and as modern as the internet.
For a large fee he is to go to Australia in search of the Tasmanian tiger, a creature believed to have been extinct for decades. If he finds the animal he is not to bring it back for posterity but to kill it and retrieve biological samples – blood, hair and organs. Why? Because a biotech company wants to make a buck from it. Why else? In this cowardly new world, as in the cowardly old world of big game hunters and colonisers, everything has a price, most of all the hunter himself.
With the cover story that he is a scientist conducting research into the local wildlife, David sets up base camp in a family home in Tasmania. In this home, however, the family is not much in evidence. There are two children, a gabby little girl and a mute boy, but dad is nowhere to be seen and mum has taken to her bed.
Though determined not to get involved with whatever is going on with this hippy lot, David becomes aware that life is not so simple in this outback. For a start, the locals are at war with the "greenies", eco-protesters who want to stop logging companies stripping the forest of trees. As the hunter tries to get on with his job, it emerges he is not the only one with an aim in mind.
Dafoe is surrounded by a fine cast, key among whom are Morgana Davies and Finn Woodlock, playing the youngsters, and Frances O'Connor as their mum. This being an Antipodean picture, Sam Neill turns up too as a friend of the family. One would complain about Mr Neill's ubiquitousness if he did not unfailingly add a certain class to everything he is in.
Nettheim sets the story up quickly, sorting his characters into bad guys, good guys and everyone else, then sets about testing our assumptions. Though the characters are kept simple they have enough about them to hold the interest.
Chief among these characters is Dafoe's David, a man of few words and most of them riffs on "leave me alone". Dafoe has a face that was made for films with hunted, or haunted, in the title.
Here, that face is buried under a beard, lending him a wild-man-of-the-mountains look, but those eyes, those cheekbones, are still recognisably Dafoe's.
What a strange career Dafoe has had, boomeranging from the bizarre (Lars von Trier's Antichrist) to the blockbuster (the Green Goblin in Spider-Man). Whatever he is in, he's a bit of a Tasmanian tiger of acting, retaining an effortless cool and mystery. Nettheim wisely recognises this and keeps him on screen as much as possible.
Humans aside, Dafoe's main co-star is the environment. This isn't the wilderness as a tourist board promo, this is nature made to look as it sometimes is – harsh, cold and hostile, at once beautiful but dangerous too. The wildlife caught on camera is weird and wonderful. The ecological point is made, without seeming trite and obvious. If these are the known wonders of the world, how much more is there to discover?
The Hunter will leave you pondering this and much else as it wends its way onwards, never preaching, never hectoring, but definitely leaving its mark on the head and heart.
Glasgow Film Theatre; Cineworld Renfrew Street, Glasgow; Cameo, Edinburgh; Belmont, Aberdeen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article