FILMS OF THE WEEK:
Taken 2 (12A)
Liberal Arts (12A)
Reviewed by Demetrios Matheou
Not long ago all the talk around Liam Neeson concerned his reunion with Schindler's List director Steven Spielberg to play Abraham Lincoln. The casting seemed perfect. Instead, Daniel Day Lewis is the man we're now seeing in trailers for Spielberg's hotly awaited film. And Neeson stars in Taken 2.
What happened? By all accounts Neeson just got tired of waiting for Lincoln to go into production. But it's tragic when an actor who gave us Rob Roy, Oskar Schindler, Michael Collins, Alfred Kinsey and the fighting priest of Gangs Of New York seems to have settled for action fodder over quality drama. And while in the initial Taken, in 2006, he could have been viewed as a thesp letting his hair down, in something that was at least proficiently made, the sequel is simply laughable.
Neeson again plays Bryan Mills, a former government agent whose remit would put 007's licence to kill in the shade. To this man killing is no more taxing or emotionally engaging than buying a pint of milk.
I can't remember why, in the first film, Mills's daughter was kidnapped and whisked to Paris; all that mattered was a one-track scenario in which he demonstrated his combat skills in freeing her. The tiny amount of characterisation on offer related to his failures as a father. For what it's worth, this is carried forward to the sequel, where his progress in this regard is interrupted when both Mills himself and his ex-wife (Famke Janssen) are kidnapped and taken – for another travelogue opportunity – to Istanbul.
I like the brief role reversal, featuring the daughter (Maggie Grace) absurdly nimble- footed as she runs across rooftops and throws grenades in her bid to rescue dad, which, of course, she does, because he has a great many people he needs to kill. At least the girl's efforts provoked a laugh. The rest is as grim and remorseless as its hero. Neeson is so much better than this.
Liberal Arts is the polar opposite of Taken 2, an intelligent, literate, satisfying film, with preoccupations the audience – not used to rescuing their loved ones from vengeful assassins – may actually recognise.
It is written, directed by and stars Josh Radnor, not a familiar face, though he could become one. He plays Jesse, a 35-year-old who works in the admissions department of a New York college, has recently been dumped by his girlfriend, and is in the grip of a premature mid-life crisis. When he's invited to the retirement dinner of his old college professor (Richard Jenkins), he jumps at the chance to return to the scene of his happiest years. The setting is an American arts college on a beautiful Ohio campus peopled by the bookishly distracted.
But Radnor lays out a range of characters at odds with its peacefulness: Jesse himself, whose present life is undermined by nostalgia; the professor too scared to leave; a young student (Elizabeth Olson) attracted to Jesse and in too much of a rush to grow up; another suicidal student whom Jesse takes under his wing.
Between these, and others, we're led to consider what it is to grow up, grow old, move on, fulfil potential or fail.
All the while, Radnor ensures that we are amused and entertained. It certainly makes one want to down tools and do more reading.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article