Music
Paul Simon & Sting, SSE Hydro, Glasgow
Jonathan Geddes
Four stars
They are an odd couple, Paul Simon and Sting, and yet they are not. Certainly when they first walked out onstage at the beginning of this marathon three-hour gig, the physical differences made them reminiscent of a buddy comedy film. Sting, taller, more overtly confident and possessing a beard that suggested he's become a survivalist, Simon, hat on and more awkward.
Yet musically there's common ground aplenty, in adding world music to pop structures, and revamping older material to suit. So while the evening's format, with both artists and their excellent bands sharing the stage and rotating in and out, ran the greatest hits gauntlet, there were surprises too. Here was So Lonely powered by tuba and Walking On The Moon given a brass makeover, while Mrs Robinson shook with Southern blues.
The numbers where the duo shared vocals was also enjoyable, particularly on softer tunes, such as a fine Fragile, although occasionally the sheer weight of numbers onstage meant the combined bands overwhelmed.
The separate segments spotlighted both individual playing and musical discrepancies. If Sting's tended to be more directly powerful then they could be too earnest, meaning a tremendously full-throated Message In A Bottle competed with the clunky, droning End of the Game. Simon's segments proved more fleet of foot, nimbly skipping between genres, whether on the lithe playfulness of 50 Ways To Leave You Lover, an effortlessly languid Still Crazy After All These Years or a rattling cover of Mystery Train.
A quibble would be that the set perhaps lacked any real spontaneity or interaction, save Simon's dedication of a typically bubbly You Can Call Me Al to his daughter, but this was a quality show, all the way through to a closing, sparse Everly Brothers cover.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article