Music
Glasgow String Quartet, Cottier Theatre, Glasgow
Michael Tumelty
Five stars
THERE was a cloud hanging over the writing-up of Monday's Cottier concert, at the end of which I heard of the death of conductor Walter Weller, who would have known and worked with the four musicians in the Glasgow String Quartet, all seasoned members of the RSNO, for many of whom Weller was a respected figure and a revered maestro.
But what a stonker of a concert violinists William Chandler and Jacqueline Spiers, violist Ian Budd and cellist Betsy Taylor turned out for the Cottier Chamber Project. It included a wonderfully-characterful performance of Sally Beamish's Opus California, a stunning quartet that had my head reeling with its needle-sharp evocations of Californian scenes; the second movement "snapshot" of the Golden Gate Bridge from the air was dizzying.
As good as that was, the group's performance of Shostakovich's Ninth String Quartet, in the Cottier's on-going cycle of the Russian master's quartets, was awesome. Despite the beginnings of some sort of liberalism in the Kruschev era, it was still a long way before 1990 and the end of a system - and the beginning of what?
Shostakovich still had much complex personal and political ground to cover, and in the 1964 quartet I think he was still treading warily and obliquely in the huge piece. The Glasgow String Quartet's edge-of-the-seat performance hit me as having struck an acutely-perceptive balance in the music: strutting away wittily and jauntily one moment, then abruptly turning in on itself, muttering conspiratorially in guarded motifs, those things that were still too risky to say aloud. This was gripping, real-life music-making from the GSQ, on a sad night.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article