Rodgers, Hammerstein & Hart
Rodgers, Hammerstein & Hart
Glasgow Royal Concert Hall
Alison Kerr
What is it about Richard Rodgers and his writing partners - or, to put it in Hammerstein speak: "how do you solve a problem like Lorenz Hart"? Rodgers & Hart is this reviewer's all-time favourite music-writing partnership, but this show was another occasion where the translation of its songs from the jazz milieu to the concert stage disappointed.
The shows that spawned such evergreen numbers as Have You Met Miss Jones? and Blue Moon are long forgotten and the songs survived thanks to jazz musicians and singers. Yet, and perhaps ironically, it was the Rodgers & Hart numbers performed with a straightforward, strings-heavy, arrangement by the Scottish Concert Orchestra, rather than an attempt at jazz instrumentation, that worked best on Monday.
Isn't It Romantic?, crooned enchantingly by Matthew Cammelle, and Spring Is Here, elegantly sung by Tim Howar, were stand-outs, along with the latter's duet, with Celia Graham, on I Wish I Were In Love Again.
Considerably less successful, on the Rodgers & Hart front, was Gillian Bevan's Bewitched, which was quite pleasing until the climax. Yes, the singer goes from starry-eyed to eyes-wide-open in the space of a short piano solo, but Bevan turned from Mr Hyde into Dr Jekyll with a Hammer-worthy hamminess.
The Rodgers & Hammerstein songs - written for the "modern" musical and bigger, splashier and more sweepingly, straight-forwardly romantic than the intimate, bittersweet Hart songs - fared better, though some arrangements seemed thread-bare and thin when they should have been velvety and luxurious.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article