"I have heard the big music/ And I'll never be the same." Mike Scott, The Waterboys.
"There isn't any difference between Echo & the Bunnymen and Kajagoogoo - it's just that you need O'levels to appreciate that Echo & the Bunnymen are crap." Pete Wylie, The Mighty Wah
And then, against the run of play, rock music reasserted itself.
It's not as if anyone seemed to be looking for it. In the early eighties, musicians were juiced by reggae and funk and soul and electronica. Indeed in 1984, if I remember rightly, everyone was talking about jazz (you can hear the echo of that in some of our other contenders). The term "rockist" was even a term of abuse in the music press during those years.
But some white boys will always want to play guitars. And in Dunfermline, in Dublin, and in Liverpool they were playing guitars that year.
Mike Scott of the Waterboys gave it a name, "the big music" and he wasn't the only one chasing it. U2, Big Country, The Alarm all were in pursuit (to varying degrees of success).
The Smiths tossed off How Soon is Now - and put it on a B side, showing that they could outmuscle anyone if they put their mind to it. But they had other concerns which we'll get to soon in this space.
Simple Minds even gave up the the cool blue European electronic model they'd established on New Gold Dream to pursue something John Peel described as "pomp rock".
As an aside you could argue that Scotland was never more central to pop culture than in 1984. From the electronic shimmer of Here Comes the Rain Again by the Eurythmics at the start of the year to the squall-and-squeal feedback of the Jesus and Mary Chain's debut single Upside Down, Scots were everywhere. Post-Postcard pop from Friends Again and Bourgie Bourgie, Glasgow romanticism from the Blue Nile, student dorm pop from adopted Scot Lloyd Cole (not a criticism; that's where I listened to it), strident electro gay anthems from Bronski Beat; all pop life was here.
It was U2 more than anyone else who set the pattern for the big music, sloughing off their scratchy attempts to be Joy Division to chase the epic, first on New Year's Day the year before and in 1984 with Pride (In the Name of Love), the archetypal U2 song, although, curiously, their 1984 album The Unforgettable Fire is more concerned with atmospherics and textures, which may be explained by the involvement of Brian Eno and may explain why it's one of the more ignored corners of their discography.
Still, the band's ambition was already clear. They were far more interested in being big than being cool. I'm not sure you could say the same of Echo and the Bunnymen. Maybe that's why I liked them more. I was at an age when cool mattered.
Led by Ian McCulloch, a man never short of a high opinion of himself, the Bunnymen fused their love of Bowie and the Doors while aiming for a Scouse psychedelia (not that there were many psychedelics at play in the early days at least, according to all accounts).
By 1984 they were at the height of their powers. On the album Ocean Rain they brought in an orchestra in and aimed for a mood of high Gothic romance. They achieved it too, most notably on the single The Killing Moon ("the most beautiful and best thing we had ever done," according to McCulloch).
They had the extra advantage over U2 that their lead singer was a looker - all skinny hips and big lips. Remember the girl I mentioned the other year? It was McCulloch's picture she had on her wall when I first met her. McCulloch described the album Ocean Rain as "kissing music".
The Killing Moon was the Bunnymen's peak. From bassist Les Pattinson's opening bars, it wears its romanticism on its (grey overcoated) sleeves. Guitarist Will Sergeant is rarely mentioned in the same breath as the Edge and yet he's more than his match here, while McCulloch plays the doomed lover via the doomy grandeur of his lyrics: "In starlit nights I saw you/ So cruelly you kissed me". This was the record McCulloch had been promising for years.
The Bunnymen rebooted Liverpool as a musical node. For a while the shadow of the Beatles didn't loom quite so large over the music scene (it would reassert itself 10 years later), while the Bunnymen, managed by Bill Drummond, played with the idea of stardom, doing tours of the Highlands and Islands, celebrating their provincial pride in events like the Crystal Day event and McCulloch played the gobby motormouth slagging all around him (and being slagged in return; see Pete Wylie's quote above).
He deliberately distanced the Bunnymen from the likes of U2 and Simple Minds, even if all of them aspired to the transcendent. "All I've got against Simple Minds and U2, who I quite like at times, is the embarrassment factor of climbing on PA stacks," he told Max Bell in The Face in 1984. "I've been known to go ninety on stage but I try not to look like a ponce. I prefer a non-acting performance because that seems more honest."
More than that, he was suspicious of Bono's desire to show people the way. "I think that rather than write Pied Piper music where people are supposed to follow or lead and go to this great congregation in the Hammersmith Odeon, our songs lead people more into themselves, more introspective," McCulloch once told Mat Snow.
"That is a big difference. All that positive attitude stuff implies that everything's all right with the individual. It's like, let's all go wherever the hell we're supposed to be going and they haven't even been within themselves. There's no self-analysis there at all. And that is true pomp when it doesn't even question anything let alone themselves."
Of course some people want to be led. In the summer of 1985 U2 took the stage at Wembley for Live Aid, played an extended version of Bad while Bono danced with a girl pulled from the crowd and established themselves as rock's chosen future.
Within a couple of years they'd be the biggest band in the world. The Bunnymen, meanwhile, were already sputtering out. McCulloch went solo in 1988 and a year later the band's drummer Pete De Freitas was killed in a motorbike accident.
Eventually they reformed, made some more records, played some decent gigs but 1984 was the moment they mattered most.
All along McCulloch said they were the best band in the world, but they didn't have the stomach to try to be the biggest. This was as close as they got, I suppose.
"I'm just waiting for the albums that sound like Ocean Rain," McCulloch once said. "But they couldn't write a song like 'The Killing Moon' in a million years..." He always had a high opinion of himself. On this occasion he might have been right.
Other Contenders
How Soon is Now, The Smiths
Breaking Point, Bourgie Bourgie
Somebody Else's Guy, Jocelyn Brown
Nelson Mandela, The Special A.K.A.
No Sell Out, Malcolm X
Ain't Nobody, Rufus and Chaka Khan
Love Wars, Womack & Womack
When Doves Cry, Prince
Im Nin' Alu, Ofra Haza
A Forest Fire, Lloyd Cole & the Commotions
Please, Please, Please Let Me Get What I Want, The Smiths
You Spin Me Round (Like a Record), Dead or Alive
The Boys of Summer, Don Henley
Upside Down, The Jesus and Mary Chain
Honey at the Core, Friends Again
Tinsel Town in the Rain, The Blue Nile
A Pagan Place, The Waterboys
I Wanna Be Loved, Elvis Costello
Sensoria, Cabaret Voltaire
Small Town Boy, Bronski Beat
The Power of Love, Frankie Goes to Hollywood
I Bloodbrother Be, Shock Headed Peters
Venceremos (We Will Win), Working Week
Each and Every One, Everything but the Girl
Another Bridge, Everything But the Girl
Cruel, Prefab Sprout
Michael Caine, Madness
Soul Train, Swans Way
A Lover Sings, Billy Bragg
Keep On Keeping On, The Redskins
So, Central Rain, R.E.M.
The Paris Match, Style Council
The Unforgettable Fire, U2
Soul Train, Swansway
NME Single of the Year: Love Wars, Womack & Womack
John Peel's Festive 50 winner: How Soon is Now, The Smiths
And the best-selling single of 1984: Do They Know It's Christmas, Band Aid
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article