Pantomime
Aladdin
King??s, Edinburgh
Mary Brennan
FOUR STARS
Just like that dusty old lamp, dusty old panto stories can ?? if rubbed up by the right hands ?? release the kind of magic, romance and spectacle that family audiences wish for in a big, traditional variety-type show. There??s been a lot of behind-the scenes elbow grease here, and it??s in crowd-pleasing evidence from the moment Abanazar tunes into the hissy-whispers of a scary Giant Cobra, that threatens to sway into the stalls. Eek! What hasn??t changed, however, is that the glowering, towering baddie is still Grant Stott in swishy folds of shiny cloth.
Aladdin is the decidedly personable Greg Barrowman, who is in no way intimidated by the veteran presence of Allan Stewart and Andy Gray ?? well, Greg has understudied his cousin John in SECC pantos, so he surely knows the ropes. Edinburgh??s panto regulars know the properly daft double act of Stewart and Gray, of course, and would doubtless forgive them if they just strung us along with old, even antique rope. We do get a re-run of the classic ??fur coat?? wordplay, but there??s also a very clever, very funny take on the notion of a running gag where risky-rapid tongue-twisters about short shirts are shuttled across the stage, as Stewart ping-pongs between Gray and Stott. Much hilarity, too, in the way Gray??s dead-pan Wishee Washee can exasperate Stewart??s garrulous Twankey with just a word: ball-o-o-o-on. One word to describe Twankey on the flying carpet? Supercalifra ?? you get the effect, and it??s special in spades. Like a big Genie squeezed into a wee lamp, a lot gets packed in to two hours, but in terms of entertainment it does the trick for old and new panto-goers alike.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article