In the corner of Dundee Rep's upstairs bar, a nail emporium has opened up shop to buff up the digits of any passing ladies in need of sharpening their claws.
Such an indulgence is the perfect pre-cursor to Robert Harling's so-feel-good-it-hurts 1980s play set in blonde bombshell Truvee Jones' shocking pink beauty parlour in America's Deep South.
Not that Harling's best-known work following its adaptation into a hit big-screen tear-jerker starring Julia Roberts and Dolly Parton comes out fighting in any way in Jemima Levick's faithful, funny and at moments quietly moving production. Quite the opposite, in fact, in what at one time might have been referred to as "a woman's play".
From Ouiser's back-woods coarseness to Clairee's stateswoman-like demeanour and all points in-between, the pan-generational sorority that flit around Truvee's place find comfort from each other beyond the hair-do's and healing treatments they're ostensibly there for. Central to this is golden girl Shelby's health issues, watched over by her mother M'Lynn and prayed for by trainee stylist Annelle.
This, then, is how the pre-Sex and the City generation lived in an unashamedly sentimental if curiously libido-free affair that is an otherwise fully-rounded portrait of blue-collar sisterhood that goes beyond its gaudy girls'-night-out trappings.
As Shelby, Natalie Wallace never overplays her doe-eyed charm, while there's a worn-out pathos to Irene McDougall's M'Lynn that's undercut by some well-timed comic sparring.
At more than two and a half hours, all this may be more mini-series than movie. While at times the play's crafted sturdiness is itself in need of a make-over, Harling's touching confection remains more than skin deep.
HHH
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article