Broken City (15)
HH
Dir: Allen Hughes
With: Mark Wahlberg, Russell Crowe
Runtime: 109 minutes
IF you had to choose two actors suited to a beefy local politics and crime thriller, chances are Mark Wahlberg and Russell Crowe would be the first names out of the tombola of toughness. But as if to prove films require a little more than big names above the title, along comes Allen Hughes's picture, a film that is not so much broken by a lacklustre script as badly dented.
Wahlberg plays Billy Taggart, a good cop in a bad town. When placed under pressure during a night shift, Taggart makes a decision that changes his future. Years later, the city's mayor, played by Russell Crowe, remembers the plucky cop and asks him to take on a new assignment. The mayor suspects his wife (an impressive Catherine Zeta-Jones) of being unfaithful and wants the reliable Taggart to investigate. With election day approaching, the pressure is on again to get results.
So begins a twisty tale of electioneering days and domineering ways as Taggart tries to find out what's going on. On several occasions, Hughes places too much responsibility on his stars to carry the film on their own, believing that if he simply puts them in a scene together the actorly sparks will fly. This doesn't work, however, unless they also have something novel to say.
In Broken City, neither the overcomplicated plot nor the overwritten dialogue grips. At other times, there seems barely any effort being made at all, as when Zeta-Jones makes a speech about human rights below a huge sign reading "Human Rights Campaign". A little imagination, people, please. But that's Broken City, a film that takes a sledgehammer to subtlety.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article