Music
Gustav Fenyo
City Halls, Glasgow
Keith Bruce
****
THE Preludes and Fugues of J S Bach and Dmitri Shostakovich could scarcely be more closely intertwined. Exactly 200 years after Bach died, Shostakovich heard young pianist Tatyana Nikolayeva play at the first international Bach competition in Leipzig, which he had been asked to judge, and began writing his own 24 responses, which she championed until her death after suffering a cerebral haemorrhage during a performance of them on America’s West Coast 25 years ago.
An opportunity to hear the works played together, as Glasgow-domiciled Hungarian Gustav Fenyo is doing over a series of five recitals in the bespoke environment of the City Halls Recital Room, is not to be missed, which accounts for the full house for the second of them on Wednesday evening.
Fenyo has spent more time working in his native land and less in his adopted home of late, but he clearly still has a loyal fan-base. On Bach his style might sometimes seem a little sober or austere. Our relationship with the Baroque has shifted a bit from the precision, keyboard-mapping of the earlier years of historically-informed performance, and Fenyo does hark back to an era before the new looseness.
On the Shostakovich, although his manner does not change, he finds marvellous dynamic shading and expressiveness. Inspired by Bach’s more technical exercises they may be (and Fenyo will play all of both books of The Well-Tempered Clavier by the close of May 22), but it was also easy to hear the influence of Debussy in some of these pieces after listening to so much of that composer’s piano works in the centenary year of his death.
There must be few things that sound more Russian, however, than the repeated figure in the Fugue of No. 6 in B Minor, and while the Prelude of No.9 in E Major, which concluded this concert, could be no-one but Shostakovich, appropriately the Fugue that derives from it is the most Bach-like.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here