Music
Castalian String Quartet
Perth Concert Hall
Keith Bruce, four stars
WHEN those who make it their business to encourage young musicians are unanimous in their endorsement of a young chamber group, there is usually a good reason for it.
Led by Finnish violinist Sini Simonen, with a French viola player, Charlotte Bonneton, and two British blokes, violinist Daniel Roberts and cellist Christopher Graves, the Castalian Quartet have been championed by the Young Classical Artists Trust and won a Borletti-Buitoni Trust Fellowship among a string of other established and highly-regarded stepping stones. They have played a string of dates for the music clubs and societies funded by Enterprise Music Scotland and will be appearing this summer at the East Neuk Festival in Fife, with one concert in partnership with pianist Christian Zacharias. Next month they are at London’s Wigmore Hall to play three of Haydn’s Opus 76 quartets.
They opened their lunchtime recital in Perth – which attracted the sort of attendance that suggests that the good word had already reached the Fair City – with the third of those, which has the Emperor’s Hymn (the tune used for the German national anthem), and variations upon it, as its slow second movement. The lightness of touch the lower strings brought to the first and third movements was particularly striking, set against a folkie edge to Simonen’s playing of the opening Allegro. Come the finale, however, it was the bold ensemble sound of the big opening chords that repeat at the end that stuck in the mind.
Schumann’s Opus 41 Quartets were a 23rd birthday present to his beloved Clara and come from the time of his first symphonic writing, which is particularly obvious in the hugely expressive arc of the second movement of the last of them, which the Castalians played here (Kilrenny Church will hear the first at East Neuk at the end of June). A much darker tone is required throughout, and Bonneton revelled in the brooding melody line she has in the Adagio, before some of Haydn’s influence reasserted itself in the comparatively brighter – but still far from unambiguous – finale.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here