SIR Ian Wood declined to say whether or not he was worried about Scotland becoming independent but indicated he thought uncertainty about the outcome of the referendum planned for 2014 could impact the North Sea.
Asked about the prospect of Scottish independence, the oil services tycoon declined to elaborate on a statement in which he said both sides in the debate must try to assure stability for the medium term.
On the subject of whether the wait for the outcome of the planned independence referendum in Autumn 2014 could deter investment in the North Sea, Sir Ian told The Herald: "That's a separate issue. It's really important that both sides and the UK genuinely understand that the oil and gas industry is in for a fragile four or five years. We need to keep investing while the infrastructure is in place."
Noting that investment has been increasing, he added: "Both sides must be aware that if this industry becomes a political football and people can't get the confidence that there will be continuity the momentum will be changed."
Speaking a week after retiring from the board of Wood Group following 45 years at the helm of the Aberdeen-based firm, Sir Ian welcomed the concessions made by the Chancellor since he hiked the tax on North Sea profits in 2011.
He said the UK Government now appears to understand the importance of maximising the recovery of the North Sea's reserves rather than just treating the industry as a source of cash.
However, he complained the industry has had scant recognition for the "huge contribution" it has made to the UK.
Sir Ian said the industry could generate $2500bn to the UK economy over the next 20-30 years, at $100 per barrel oil if recovery rates are maximised.
The businessman reiterated support for plans to redesign Aberdeen's Union Terrace Gardens, for which he offered £50 million backing. These were rejected by the city council in August.
He received a lifetime achievement award from Oil & Gas UK last night.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article