Scottish Salmon Company saw its trading profit slump last year to £500,000, from £14.4 million in 2011, with an "unprecedented" biological issue prompting a legal dispute and adding to a severe impact from stock disease.
The company, which employs 400 around Scotland, has reported a fall in revenues from £90m to £79.5m after what it calls "a challenging year".
Harvest volumes for 2012 were almost 24,000 tonnes (up from 23,000) helped by new sites at Loch Roag, on the west coast of Lewis, in the later part of the year.
Higher-than-anticipated costs on harvested fish, especially in the last quarter, impacted on results. "This is primarily as a result of a biological issue caused by sub-standard feed that impacted growth, survival and stock's ability to resist expected environmental challenges," the company said. "The situation was unprecedented and this stock, lower in weight and quality and consequentially more difficult and costly to process, increased costs both at farm level and also through the harvesting and processing value chain. This situation is now the subject of legal negotiations."
Market prices were low for most of 2012, SSC said. "This was in part due to harvesting dynamics across Europe along with high incidences of Amoebic Gill Disease across the Scottish industry which has resulted in earlier harvesting."
SSC fulfilled customer obligations and 2012 saw the company secure contracts with leading UK retailers and expand its exports to more than 20 countries. It is seeking new sites particularly in the Western Isles.
Stewart McLelland, chief executive, said: "The company continues to see growing market demand for high quality sustainably-farmed Scottish salmon and is on course to develop the volume of premium salmon to 29,000 tonnes in 2014."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article