Our 2014 portfolio came through its first major test with flying colours last week with its overall valuation substantially unchanged in the face of a general market downturn.
True, there were some casualties, with engineering giant IMI and household goods specialist Dunelm giving up previous gains and Smart Metering Systems dropping towards its stop/loss level.
But they were balanced by further support for Scottish cloud computing group Iomart and alternative energy supplier Infinis, while Dialight justified our decision to give the shares a second chance with a useful rise over the week.
Our other portfolios fared less well, with all three recording overall losses of around 1.5% when we conducted our review of progress on Wednesday morning.
Not surprisingly, companies with a global presence were the major casualties as investors reacted to fears over the economies of emerging nations on American fiscal tightening and the prospect of slower growth in China.
We had tended to steer clear of these multinational giants in favour of smaller UK-biased businesses with recent recommendations, but still suffered a dip in profits from longstanding holdings in companies such as Compass, Smiths Group and Halma.
Services group DCC was another to fall on concerns that its fuel distribution arm will be hit by a fall in demand due to the relatively mild weather across much of the UK.
Against that, Anglo-American jewellery group Signet finally moved into profit as it continued the recovery which has seen its shares rise almost 10% in the past month.
We are hopeful that the UK stock market should quickly recover and we are monitoring a number of prospects for our 2011 portfolio which has room for one more nominal purchase.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article