Fashion and homewares retailer Laura Ashley has warned over full-year profits after being hit by falling sales and surging costs.
The group revealed a 29% plunge in pre-tax profits to £7.8 million for the six months to December 31.
Retail sales over its first half, which include key Christmas trading, fell 3.5% on a like-for-like basis, putting it on a shortened list of losers over what proved to be a robust festive season elsewhere on the high street.
Shares in the group tumbled 11% as Laura Ashley alerted over profits amid tough trading, with like-for-like sales still in the red since the start of 2017 - down 0.6% in the six weeks to February 11.
Chairman Tan Sri Dr Khoo Kay Peng said: "Trading conditions have been demanding during the first six months of the year.
"The board have reviewed the first half results and forecasts for the remainder of the year to 30 June 2017 and, given the continued market challenges, feels that net pre-tax profit for the year will fall below market expectations."
The group said profits were also knocked by rising costs after the pound's plunge in value since the EU referendum, as well as the new national living wage, which together contributed to a 6% rise in operating costs to £52.3 million.
Laura Ashley chief finance officer Sean Anglim told the Press Association the group suffered in the wake of the Brexit vote, which impacted first-quarter sales.
And while it saw an improvement over the second quarter, he said the group's festive performance was hit as it had one less week of clearance sales compared with a year earlier, which knocked trading for so-called big-ticket items, such as its furniture ranges.
The group said like-for-like furniture sales fell 8% in its first half, while decorating sales dropped 6.4% and fashion was 3.2% lower.
But online sales grew by 2.1% on a like-for-like basis.
Mr Anglim said the firm remains optimistic despite the profit warning for the full year, having recently advanced further into two major overseas markets by signing up a new franchise partner in India and launching online in China for the first time late last year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here