A spokeswoman for one of Scotland's leading networks for women in business has said that post-independence moves towards boosting female membership of private and public-sector boards to 40% might provide a competitive advantage for Scottish business.
Alison Henderson, vice-chair of the Association of Scottish Businesswomen said that while the organisation had not reached a common position on the desirability of imposed quotas for female board members, she believed that new rules would be positive for Scotland.
Henderson said: "Some of the Scandinavian countries that have moved towards having quotas or aiming to get more women on boards have brought out figures that show it has had a positive benefit.
"I don't see why that wouldn't make Scotland stand out, and we might see that it had a positive effect on the economy. It could be a point of competitive advantage with the rest of the UK."
Last week, the Scottish Government announced "the first-ever all-women Cabinet event" on June 9, marking 100 days until the referendum.
The event is intended to "bring together women from organisations across Scotland to discuss all of the issues of importance in the referendum. It will explore the opportunities to promote and improve gender equality with independence. Issues such as female representation on boards, the improvement of childcare and employment law will be on the agenda".
Deputy First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said: "The Scottish Government is proud to have taken action on gender equality. The Scottish female employment rate is now the highest of any UK nation, and the inactivity rate is the lowest. The Scottish Government also wants to see women make up at least 40% of public and private boards."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article