Oil giant BP is moving its offshore staff to a three-weeks-on, three-weeks-off rota as part of plans to make the business more competitive.
The company informed staff of its decision yesterday and has begun a consultation process on the issue.
BP proposes bringing in the changes from next January, when staff would move from their current two-weeks-on, three-weeks-off rota to the new working pattern.
It said the move would deliver "material, long-term cost savings" to its UK offshore business, as well as reducing logistical risk, providing better operational continuity and increasing operating efficiency.
The issue of any potential redundancies would be explored as part of a separate consultation.
A BP spokesman said: "Across BP we are looking at a range of measures to make our business more competitive for the long term.
"In the North Sea, we believe that a key step toward this is to review our UK offshore rotational arrangements. We spoke to employee representatives yesterday about our decision to move to a 3/3 rota.
"We are committed to full and open consultation with our employee consultation and communication forum and also to ensuring that safe operations remain our number one priority by conducting a thorough risk assessment."
The company said it has taken the decision within the context of a "sustained and challenging business environment" and that it is one of a range of measures being looked at to make the business more competitive.
BP reported a 20% drop in first-quarter profits last month after it was hit by a sharp slump in oil and gas prices.
The energy giant said underlying replacement cost profit fell to 2.6 billion US dollars (£1.7 billion) from 3.2 billion US dollars (£2.1 billion) in the same period last year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article